EMSF vs. FMED ETF Comparison
Comparison of Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF) to Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF (FMED)
EMSF
Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF
EMSF Description
EMSF actively invests in common and preferred stocks of companies in emerging markets, including countries that may be considered frontier. While the fund has an all-cap exposure, it expects to invest substantially in smaller companies. The fund looks for sustainable growth based on fundamental characteristics such as balance sheet information, size, cash flow stability, and financial health. It also applies various ESG standards, using third-party data and the adviser's proprietary research, to identify investments that potentially contribute to a sustainable future by addressing global environmental and social challenges. The fund also employs exclusionary ESG screens, which avoid controversial businesses such as tobacco, weapons, and fossil fuels. The fund may engage its portfolio companies on sustainability and governance matters through active dialogue, exercising shareholder rights, and encouraging enhanced ESG disclosure.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$27.03
Average Daily Volume
2,753
6
FMED
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF
FMED Description
The fund normally invests at least 80% of assets in securities of disruptive medicine companies. Fidelity's disruptive strategies seek to identify innovative developments that could signal new directions for delivering products and services to customers. Generally, these companies have or are developing new or unconventional ways of doing business that could disrupt and displace incumbents over time. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$25.74
Average Daily Volume
4,900
52
Performance
| Period | EMSF | FMED |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -7.39% | -1.11% |
| 60 Days | 3.44% | -1.07% |
| 90 Days | 9.12% | 3.68% |
| 12 Months | 10.28% | 25.02% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in EMSF | Weight in FMED | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEGN | F | 3.9% | 2.21% | 2.21% |
EMSF Underweight 51 Positions Relative to FMED
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BSX | C | -5.99% | |
| UNH | C | -4.41% | |
| ISRG | B | -4.27% | |
| DHR | D | -3.86% | |
| PODD | A | -3.85% | |
| EXAS | A | -3.82% | |
| REGN | F | -3.78% | |
| ALNY | C | -3.12% | |
| ARGX | A | -3.04% | |
| SYK | A | -2.58% | |
| PEN | A | -2.39% | |
| LFST | C | -2.3% | |
| INSP | D | -2.09% | |
| EW | D | -2.03% | |
| VEEV | B | -2.03% | |
| TMO | D | -1.92% | |
| AGL | F | -1.9% | |
| LLY | F | -1.88% | |
| DXCM | C | -1.88% | |
| MASI | A | -1.8% | |
| PRCT | A | -1.68% | |
| ZLAB | B | -1.61% | |
| JANX | A | -1.44% | |
| GKOS | B | -1.39% | |
| RMD | A | -1.35% | |
| KROS | A | -1.28% | |
| PCVX | C | -1.26% | |
| RGEN | D | -1.23% | |
| BRKR | D | -1.18% | |
| XENE | C | -1.18% | |
| CRNX | B | -1.17% | |
| PRVA | B | -1.16% | |
| TNDM | F | -1.11% | |
| CYTK | F | -1.1% | |
| CNC | D | -1.06% | |
| DYN | F | -0.98% | |
| WST | B | -0.93% | |
| DOCS | A | -0.92% | |
| ASND | F | -0.87% | |
| PHR | F | -0.83% | |
| VRTX | D | -0.82% | |
| ALGN | F | -0.71% | |
| TXG | F | -0.7% | |
| NTRA | B | -0.45% | |
| BNTX | B | -0.42% | |
| DNLI | C | -0.41% | |
| IRTC | C | -0.39% | |
| ACLX | B | -0.39% | |
| ANAB | F | -0.26% | |
| NRIX | B | -0.19% | |
| DAWN | A | -0.12% |
EMSF: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
FMED: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
