EMIF vs. QVAL ETF Comparison
Comparison of iShares S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure Index Fund (EMIF) to ValueShares U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL)
EMIF
iShares S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure Index Fund
EMIF Description
The investment seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of 30 of the largest emerging market equities in the infrastructure industry. The fund generally invests at least 90% of its assets in securities of the underlying index and in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. It seeks to track the investment results of the S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure IndexTM (the "underlying index"), which is designed to track performance of 30 of the largest publicly listed companies in the infrastructure industry in emerging markets. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$21.48
Average Daily Volume
12,632
1
QVAL
ValueShares U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
QVAL Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF. Under normal circumstances, it seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in U.S. equity securities that the Adviser believes, based on quantitative analysis, are undervalued at the time of purchase and have the potential for capital appreciation. The fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in securities of U.S. companies. It will invest primarily in the exchange-listed common stock of U.S. companies. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$44.30
Average Daily Volume
23,051
50
Performance
Period | EMIF | QVAL |
---|---|---|
30 Days | 0.19% | 6.03% |
60 Days | -3.48% | 1.35% |
90 Days | -2.31% | 6.60% |
12 Months | -0.11% | 25.15% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol | Grade | Weight in EMIF | Weight in QVAL | Overlap |
---|
EMIF Overweight 1 Positions Relative to QVAL
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
HKD | F | -0.04% |
EMIF Underweight 50 Positions Relative to QVAL
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
TEX | C | -2.4% | |
TMHC | B | -2.35% | |
TOL | B | -2.34% | |
PHM | B | -2.31% | |
ALSN | A | -2.26% | |
MAT | C | -2.26% | |
ON | C | -2.2% | |
UFPI | B | -2.2% | |
THC | B | -2.16% | |
LBRT | B | -2.13% | |
FOXA | A | -2.11% | |
MOH | D | -2.1% | |
CTSH | B | -2.08% | |
CNC | B | -2.08% | |
MO | C | -2.08% | |
LEA | D | -2.06% | |
OMC | A | -2.06% | |
CMCSA | C | -2.06% | |
APA | D | -2.05% | |
SNA | B | -2.04% | |
IPG | C | -2.04% | |
OC | B | -2.01% | |
UTHR | C | -2.01% | |
BG | D | -2.01% | |
TAP | D | -2.0% | |
GPK | B | -1.99% | |
AGCO | F | -1.98% | |
HPQ | C | -1.98% | |
KHC | C | -1.97% | |
VLO | C | -1.96% | |
T | B | -1.93% | |
FANG | B | -1.92% | |
CVI | D | -1.92% | |
ELV | C | -1.9% | |
HAL | D | -1.9% | |
JBL | F | -1.88% | |
CEIX | D | -1.86% | |
SIG | F | -1.85% | |
WFRD | D | -1.83% | |
ARCH | F | -1.83% | |
CRI | F | -1.83% | |
SM | D | -1.8% | |
ULTA | F | -1.8% | |
PCAR | F | -1.79% | |
DINO | F | -1.78% | |
INSW | D | -1.76% | |
PVH | F | -1.73% | |
DAL | D | -1.71% | |
CROX | D | -1.68% | |
PBF | F | -1.66% |
EMIF: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
QVAL: Top Represented Industries & Keywords