EMIF vs. QVAL ETF Comparison

Comparison of iShares S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure Index Fund (EMIF) to ValueShares U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL)
EMIF

iShares S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure Index Fund

EMIF Description

The investment seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of 30 of the largest emerging market equities in the infrastructure industry. The fund generally invests at least 90% of its assets in securities of the underlying index and in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. It seeks to track the investment results of the S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure IndexTM (the "underlying index"), which is designed to track performance of 30 of the largest publicly listed companies in the infrastructure industry in emerging markets. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$21.48

Average Daily Volume

12,632

Number of Holdings *

1

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
QVAL

ValueShares U.S. Quantitative Value ETF

QVAL Description The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF. Under normal circumstances, it seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in U.S. equity securities that the Adviser believes, based on quantitative analysis, are undervalued at the time of purchase and have the potential for capital appreciation. The fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in securities of U.S. companies. It will invest primarily in the exchange-listed common stock of U.S. companies. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$44.30

Average Daily Volume

23,051

Number of Holdings *

50

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period EMIF QVAL
30 Days 0.19% 6.03%
60 Days -3.48% 1.35%
90 Days -2.31% 6.60%
12 Months -0.11% 25.15%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in EMIF Weight in QVAL Overlap
EMIF Overweight 1 Positions Relative to QVAL
Symbol Grade Weight
HKD F -0.04%
EMIF Underweight 50 Positions Relative to QVAL
Symbol Grade Weight
TEX C -2.4%
TMHC B -2.35%
TOL B -2.34%
PHM B -2.31%
ALSN A -2.26%
MAT C -2.26%
ON C -2.2%
UFPI B -2.2%
THC B -2.16%
LBRT B -2.13%
FOXA A -2.11%
MOH D -2.1%
CTSH B -2.08%
CNC B -2.08%
MO C -2.08%
LEA D -2.06%
OMC A -2.06%
CMCSA C -2.06%
APA D -2.05%
SNA B -2.04%
IPG C -2.04%
OC B -2.01%
UTHR C -2.01%
BG D -2.01%
TAP D -2.0%
GPK B -1.99%
AGCO F -1.98%
HPQ C -1.98%
KHC C -1.97%
VLO C -1.96%
T B -1.93%
FANG B -1.92%
CVI D -1.92%
ELV C -1.9%
HAL D -1.9%
JBL F -1.88%
CEIX D -1.86%
SIG F -1.85%
WFRD D -1.83%
ARCH F -1.83%
CRI F -1.83%
SM D -1.8%
ULTA F -1.8%
PCAR F -1.79%
DINO F -1.78%
INSW D -1.76%
PVH F -1.73%
DAL D -1.71%
CROX D -1.68%
PBF F -1.66%

EMIF: Top Represented Industries & Keywords

Industries: Software - Application
Keywords: Digital Media
Compare ETFs