EEMS vs. PGJ ETF Comparison

Comparison of iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index Fund (EEMS) to PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ)
EEMS

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index Fund

EEMS Description

The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index. The fund generally invests at least 90% of assets in the securities of the underlying index and in DRs representing securities in the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to measure the performance of equity securities in the bottom 14% of market capitalization of emerging market countries. It concentrates its investments in a particular industry or group of industries to approximately the same extent that the underlying index is concentrated. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$59.81

Average Daily Volume

42,926

Number of Holdings *

2

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$20.79

Average Daily Volume

44,730

Number of Holdings *

53

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period EEMS PGJ
30 Days -3.38% -11.04%
60 Days -0.95% -14.94%
90 Days -1.39% -19.57%
12 Months 11.08% -28.62%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in EEMS Weight in PGJ Overlap
EEMS Overweight 2 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
IMOS F 0.06%
TSM D 0.03%
EEMS Underweight 53 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
BABA A -8.85%
TCOM F -7.63%
JD F -7.32%
BIDU F -7.28%
YUMC F -6.74%
NTES F -4.71%
TME D -4.42%
ZTO F -3.81%
NIO F -3.72%
BEKE F -3.68%
VIPS F -3.57%
YMM F -3.33%
HTHT F -3.12%
TAL F -2.85%
BZ F -2.79%
LI F -2.55%
QFIN D -1.83%
XPEV D -1.31%
BILI B -1.14%
ATHM D -1.08%
IQ F -1.06%
DQ F -0.84%
RLX F -0.82%
MOMO B -0.76%
CSIQ F -0.73%
ATAT F -0.72%
MNSO F -0.7%
FINV B -0.68%
GDS B -0.67%
ZLAB D -0.63%
JKS F -0.59%
GOTU F -0.49%
WB F -0.47%
TIGR F -0.36%
EH F -0.34%
SOHU B -0.33%
HUYA D -0.27%
QD D -0.25%
RERE A -0.2%
DOYU B -0.2%
NOAH F -0.18%
VNET F -0.18%
DDL D -0.17%
LX D -0.16%
TUYA F -0.13%
API D -0.13%
KC F -0.13%
DADA F -0.1%
WDH F -0.1%
DAO F -0.08%
NIU D -0.07%
BZUN F -0.07%
IMAB F -0.06%
Compare ETFs