EDOC vs. SAEF ETF Comparison

Comparison of Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) to Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF)

EDOC

Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF

EDOC Description

The Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) seeks to invest in companies positioned to benefit from further advances in the field of telemedicine and digital health. This includes companies involved in Telemedicine, Health Care Analytics, Connected Health Care Devices, and Administrative Digitization.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$9.82

Average Daily Volume

29,369

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

SAEF

Schwab Ariel ESG ETF

SAEF Description

Schwab Ariel ESG ETF is an exchange traded fund launched and managed by Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc. The fund is co-managed by Ariel Investments, LLC. It invests in the public equity markets of the United States. The fund invests in stocks of companies operating across diversified sectors. It invests in growth and value stocks of diverse market cap companies, within the market capitalization range of the Russell 2500 Index. The fund invests in stocks of companies that are deemed socially conscious in their business dealings and directly promote environmental responsibility. It employs fundamental and quantitative analysis with bottom-up stock picking approach to create its portfolio. It employs proprietary research to create its portfolio. Schwab Ariel ESG ETF was formed on November 16, 2021 and is domiciled in the United States.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$28.76

Average Daily Volume

2,753

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	EDOC	SAEF
30 Days	1.25%	7.36%
60 Days	0.52%	8.34%
90 Days	3.51%	9.91%
12 Months	8.97%	38.59%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in EDOC	Weight in SAEF	Overlap
	LH	B	4.28%	1.23%	1.23%

EDOC Overweight 30 Positions Relative to SAEF

Symbol	Grade	Weight
DOCS	C	4.97%
MASI	B	4.46%
PODD	C	4.39%
DXCM	C	4.07%
QGEN	D	3.95%
DGX	A	3.94%
ILMN	C	3.93%
A	D	3.87%
RMD	C	3.85%
HIMS	B	3.85%
VCYT	B	3.72%
OSCR	D	3.55%
IQV	F	3.51%
IRTC	C	3.4%
PRVA	C	3.05%
RCM	A	2.98%
TWST	F	2.9%
OMCL	C	2.78%
TNDM	D	2.47%
TDOC	C	2.0%
EVH	F	1.86%
PHR	F	1.5%
AMN	F	1.19%
LFST	B	1.06%
PACB	F	0.64%
GDRX	F	0.49%
DCGO	B	0.46%
FLGT	F	0.46%
LFMD	D	0.4%
DH	F	0.3%

EDOC Underweight 56 Positions Relative to SAEF

Symbol	Grade	Weight
OSW	B	-4.39%
BCO	F	-4.21%
NCLH	B	-3.64%
FI	A	-3.4%
LIND	C	-3.32%
KKR	A	-2.42%
FAF	A	-2.41%
GNRC	C	-2.41%
ZBRA	B	-2.3%
NVT	B	-2.29%
JLL	D	-2.28%
GS	A	-2.24%
REZI	A	-2.14%
NTRS	A	-2.09%
FICO	B	-2.08%
PBH	A	-2.04%
MAT	D	-1.81%
KMT	B	-1.8%
CBRE	B	-1.79%
CRL	D	-1.78%
GNTX	C	-1.76%
MIDD	C	-1.71%
KEYS	A	-1.65%
LFUS	D	-1.57%
WEX	D	-1.54%
KN	B	-1.53%
MTB	A	-1.53%
DNB	B	-1.5%
AXTA	B	-1.41%
MSI	B	-1.41%
MANU	B	-1.41%
NVST	B	-1.31%
MAS	D	-1.29%
BIO	C	-1.28%
MSGS	A	-1.26%
ZBH	C	-1.25%
ADTN	A	-1.24%
MHK	D	-1.22%
IPG	D	-1.22%
SSD	F	-1.21%
ST	F	-1.21%
SNA	A	-1.19%
BRC	D	-1.16%
ATGE	B	-1.15%
AFL	B	-1.13%
MSGE	F	-1.1%
BWA	D	-1.09%
KMX	B	-0.98%
KFY	B	-0.97%
SJM	D	-0.94%
PGR	A	-0.92%
REYN	D	-0.91%
LESL	D	-0.86%
HCKT	B	-0.83%
PARA	C	-0.56%
PHIN	A	-0.28%