EAGL vs. MVFD ETF Comparison

Comparison of Eagle Capital Select Equity ETF (EAGL) to Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree Index ETF (MVFD)
EAGL

Eagle Capital Select Equity ETF

EAGL Description

EAGL seeks to outperform the US equity markets through a narrow exposure to global value stocks. The actively managed fund generally holds 15-35 stocks assessed based on the advisers estimate of their long-term intrinsic values. The belief is that there is an opportunity to capture excess returns through a longer-term perspective. Thus, several investments of the fund are expected to be made with a five to seven-year holding period. The portfolio is constructed using a fundamental analysis that considers business changes, growth prospects, margins, industry factors, and valuation scenarios over the next 5 to 10 years, which seeks to identify a margin of safety based on valuation discount, resilience, growth opportunities, and strong management. The fund primarily focuses on US stocks and large-cap companies. However, the fund may invest in companies of any size and geographic location, including emerging markets. EAGL launched by converting an SMA with $1.8 billion in assets.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$28.47

Average Daily Volume

51,669

Number of Holdings *

24

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
MVFD

Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree Index ETF

MVFD Description MVFD focuses on equities demonstrating strong cash flow and dividend potential, shifting towards fixed income ETFs linked to US Treasurys in unfavorable cash flow scenarios. The fund seeks to mirror the performance of its target index, comprised of 40 equally weighted stocks selected for their financial health and income-producing ability, alongside up to 5 fixed income ETFs. Driving its selection process is the proprietary Volume Factor methodology, which examines stocks by analyzing the dynamics between market volume and price. This analysis is facilitated by a distinctive volume-price confirmation indicator. Evaluating a broad pool of 3,000 U.S. stocks, the methodology generates a composite score to rank and ensure that only the top-performing equities under positive financial conditions are chosen. MVFDs strategy aims for adaptability, modifying its equity-to-fixed income ratio based on prevailing financial trends. Furthermore, the index undergoes quarterly reconstitution to realign with market changes, optimizing the funds portfolio composition accordingly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.06

Average Daily Volume

5,829

Number of Holdings *

39

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period EAGL MVFD
30 Days 2.48% 1.04%
60 Days 4.29% 4.30%
90 Days 6.91% 6.77%
12 Months
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in EAGL Weight in MVFD Overlap
EAGL Overweight 24 Positions Relative to MVFD
Symbol Grade Weight
AMZN B 8.03%
META C 5.74%
GOOGL B 5.1%
COP B 4.88%
AON B 4.66%
UNH C 4.31%
MSFT D 4.11%
WDAY C 4.03%
GEV A 3.86%
COF B 3.8%
AER B 3.54%
SAP B 3.5%
TSM B 3.48%
CHTR B 3.28%
HUM D 2.83%
CMCSA B 2.46%
WWD B 2.33%
V A 2.21%
AA A 2.07%
WFC A 2.06%
HLT A 2.04%
ELV F 2.0%
NFLX A 1.65%
OXY F 1.45%
EAGL Underweight 39 Positions Relative to MVFD
Symbol Grade Weight
TGNA B -3.73%
MO A -3.49%
FOX A -3.41%
FOXA B -3.25%
HLNE A -3.21%
MATX B -2.96%
VOYA B -2.95%
ABM B -2.91%
ADTN A -2.88%
JHG B -2.86%
BKH A -2.86%
QCOM F -2.8%
MLI B -2.75%
NYT D -2.73%
MEI F -2.56%
EXPD D -2.42%
RHI C -2.39%
SR A -2.39%
SEM B -2.39%
GILD B -2.37%
WKC D -2.35%
CCK D -2.28%
AMKR F -2.23%
EXPI C -2.21%
LPX A -2.18%
PM A -2.18%
CHRD F -2.17%
NTAP C -2.16%
ALLY C -2.14%
AFL C -2.14%
SSNC C -2.11%
WD D -2.1%
NRG B -2.07%
CL D -2.01%
TTC F -2.0%
CME A -1.99%
KBH D -1.91%
BCO F -1.84%
ADM D -1.82%
Compare ETFs