DWLD vs. PGJ ETF Comparison

Comparison of Davis Select Worldwide ETF (DWLD) to PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ)
DWLD

Davis Select Worldwide ETF

DWLD Description

The investment seeks long-term growth of capital. The fund's investment adviser, uses the Davis Investment Discipline to invest the fund's portfolio principally in common stocks issued by both United States and foreign companies, including countries with developed or emerging markets. It will invest significantly in issuers (i) organized or located outside of the U.S.; (ii) whose primary trading market is located outside the U.S.; or (iii) doing a substantial amount of business outside the U.S., which the adviser considers to be a company that derives at least 50% of its revenue from business outside the U.S. or has at least 50% of its assets outside the U.S.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$33.92

Average Daily Volume

10,248

Number of Holdings *

25

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$22.93

Average Daily Volume

47,799

Number of Holdings *

54

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period DWLD PGJ
30 Days -0.29% -6.73%
60 Days -0.25% -11.39%
90 Days 3.23% -3.46%
12 Months 19.96% -6.73%
3 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in DWLD Weight in PGJ Overlap
BEKE C 2.91% 3.96% 2.91%
JD D 1.98% 6.95% 1.98%
NOAH D 0.32% 0.17% 0.17%
DWLD Overweight 22 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
META A 6.82%
COF D 4.78%
BRK.A C 4.32%
AMZN A 3.73%
HUM C 3.7%
MGM B 3.25%
GOOG A 2.92%
WFC C 2.78%
AMAT B 2.76%
VTRS D 2.26%
MKL D 2.0%
CI D 1.93%
SE B 1.05%
TSN D 0.97%
SOLV F 0.92%
OC D 0.89%
CPNG C 0.87%
DGX C 0.79%
IAC F 0.73%
AGCO F 0.71%
DAR F 0.48%
YOU B 0.26%
DWLD Underweight 51 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
BABA D -8.2%
TCOM C -8.19%
BIDU F -6.91%
YUMC F -6.6%
NTES D -4.58%
TME B -4.39%
ZTO F -3.87%
NIO F -3.84%
BZ D -3.61%
VIPS F -3.41%
YMM D -3.22%
HTHT F -3.15%
TAL D -2.69%
LI F -2.59%
QFIN D -1.77%
IQ D -1.24%
XPEV F -1.2%
BILI C -1.15%
ATHM D -1.13%
HOLI B -0.94%
RLX F -0.79%
ATAT B -0.75%
MNSO F -0.74%
DQ F -0.71%
MOMO B -0.65%
CSIQ F -0.63%
GDS B -0.63%
FINV C -0.57%
JKS D -0.57%
ZLAB F -0.54%
GOTU D -0.53%
WB D -0.48%
TIGR B -0.37%
EH D -0.36%
SOHU A -0.3%
HUYA C -0.27%
QD F -0.23%
VNET C -0.2%
RERE C -0.19%
DOYU B -0.19%
DDL C -0.18%
LX F -0.14%
TUYA F -0.13%
KC F -0.12%
API D -0.11%
WDH D -0.1%
DADA F -0.1%
DAO C -0.09%
BZUN D -0.07%
NIU F -0.06%
IMAB F -0.06%
Compare ETFs