DWAT vs. UMI ETF Comparison
Comparison of Arrow DWA Tactical ETF (DWAT) to USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund (UMI)
DWAT
Arrow DWA Tactical ETF
DWAT Description
The investment seeks to achieve long-term capital appreciation with capital preservation as a secondary objective. The fund primarily invests in other exchange traded funds that each invest primarily in domestic and foreign, equity securities of any market capitalization, fixed-income securities of any credit quality, or alternative assets. The fund may invest up to 25% of its total assets in the Tactical Subsidiary. The Tactical Subsidiary will invest primarily in commodity futures, fixed-income securities and cash equivalents, which are intended to serve as margin or collateral for its investments in commodity futures. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$11.69
Average Daily Volume
640
5
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund
UMI Description
The investment seeks a high level of current income; as a secondary objective, the fund seeks capital appreciation. The fund will seek to achieve its investment objectives by investing, under normal market conditions, at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of U.S. and Canadian companies of any market capitalization deemed by the Sub-Adviser to be engaged in the midstream energy sector. It will invest more than 25% of the value of its total assets in the energy, oil, and gas industries. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$50.99
Average Daily Volume
14,717
16
Performance
| Period | DWAT | UMI |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -0.54% | 8.41% |
| 60 Days | 3.21% | 13.21% |
| 90 Days | 4.72% | 16.17% |
| 12 Months | 21.77% | 49.05% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in DWAT | Weight in UMI | Overlap |
|---|
DWAT: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
UMI: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
