CZA vs. GSIB ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF (CZA) to Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB)
CZA

Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF

CZA Description

The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the performance, before the fund's fees and expenses, of an index called the Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index. The fund will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the index and depositary receipts representing securities that comprise the index. It generally invests in all of the securities comprising the index in proportion to their weightings in the index. The index is comprised of 100 securities selected, based on investment and other criteria, from a universe of mid-capitalization securities including MLPs, ADRs and BDCs.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$112.45

Average Daily Volume

3,102

Number of Holdings *

94

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
GSIB

Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF

GSIB Description The fund is an actively managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF") that will invest in the equity securities of companies that operate in the global banking sector. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes, in securities that are part of the global banking sector and in American Depositary Receipts ("ADRs") and Global Depositary Receipts ("GDRs") that represent such companies in the banking sector. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$33.38

Average Daily Volume

2,358

Number of Holdings *

16

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period CZA GSIB
30 Days 3.26% 4.57%
60 Days 5.04% 7.82%
90 Days 7.69% 7.78%
12 Months 30.18%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in CZA Weight in GSIB Overlap
STT A 1.86% 4.06% 1.86%
CZA Overweight 93 Positions Relative to GSIB
Symbol Grade Weight
VMC B 2.4%
WAB B 2.18%
AVB B 2.11%
ETR B 2.06%
WTW B 2.04%
BRO B 1.98%
XYL D 1.94%
EQR B 1.86%
PPG F 1.84%
DOV A 1.77%
LYB F 1.73%
FTV C 1.7%
KEYS A 1.7%
VLTO D 1.62%
AEE A 1.58%
WRB A 1.53%
CINF A 1.53%
ES D 1.46%
NTRS A 1.44%
LPLA A 1.43%
TDY B 1.41%
IFF D 1.41%
PKG A 1.38%
LDOS C 1.38%
CSL C 1.31%
ESS B 1.3%
PFG D 1.3%
J F 1.3%
CHKP D 1.27%
FOX A 1.24%
AER B 1.24%
JBHT C 1.2%
BAH F 1.16%
CRBG B 1.16%
PNR A 1.12%
IEX B 1.11%
BAX D 1.1%
TRMB B 1.1%
WMG C 1.1%
MAS D 1.09%
WLK D 1.05%
GGG B 0.99%
UDR B 0.95%
AMCR D 0.94%
ACM A 0.94%
WES C 0.93%
GLPI C 0.89%
REG B 0.85%
CNA B 0.85%
PFGC B 0.83%
LOGI D 0.81%
NVT B 0.8%
WPC D 0.79%
ITT A 0.79%
EMN D 0.76%
RRX B 0.76%
AIZ A 0.73%
BWXT B 0.72%
ATR B 0.71%
CHDN B 0.69%
SEIC B 0.67%
AOS F 0.66%
WWD B 0.65%
CACI D 0.64%
ALSN B 0.64%
EHC B 0.62%
CR A 0.61%
INGR B 0.58%
KNTK B 0.58%
TFX F 0.58%
CHE D 0.53%
VOYA B 0.5%
IVZ B 0.5%
ESAB B 0.48%
BLCO D 0.47%
BPOP B 0.46%
OSK B 0.46%
FLS B 0.46%
MDU D 0.45%
ESI A 0.43%
AWI A 0.43%
IDA A 0.41%
FNB A 0.4%
ESNT D 0.39%
COLD D 0.39%
SLGN A 0.38%
SIGI C 0.38%
SNDR B 0.35%
CWEN C 0.35%
RRR D 0.34%
ACT D 0.34%
ST F 0.31%
FLO D 0.3%
CZA Underweight 15 Positions Relative to GSIB
Symbol Grade Weight
WFC A -4.33%
MS A -4.27%
BK A -4.1%
MFG B -3.93%
GS A -3.89%
BAC A -3.76%
JPM A -3.75%
MUFG B -3.7%
C A -3.67%
BCS C -3.57%
SMFG B -3.54%
HSBC B -3.37%
SAN F -3.09%
TD F -2.86%
ING F -2.75%
Compare ETFs