CZA vs. GSFP ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF (CZA) to Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF (GSFP)
CZA

Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF

CZA Description

The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the performance, before the fund's fees and expenses, of an index called the Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index. The fund will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the index and depositary receipts representing securities that comprise the index. It generally invests in all of the securities comprising the index in proportion to their weightings in the index. The index is comprised of 100 securities selected, based on investment and other criteria, from a universe of mid-capitalization securities including MLPs, ADRs and BDCs.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$112.18

Average Daily Volume

3,082

Number of Holdings *

94

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
GSFP

Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF

GSFP Description The fund invests, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets plus any borrowings for investment purposes in equity investments in U.S. and non-U.S. companies that Goldman Sachs Asset Management, L.P. (GSAM or the Investment Adviser) believes are associated, at the time the investment is first added to the fund's portfolio, with seeking to address environmental problems. It may have significant exposure to specific sectors including, but not limited to, the industrials, materials and technology sectors. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$32.30

Average Daily Volume

886

Number of Holdings *

21

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period CZA GSFP
30 Days 2.57% -0.31%
60 Days 4.74% -0.30%
90 Days 6.77% 0.42%
12 Months 29.08% 18.33%
3 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in CZA Weight in GSFP Overlap
ACM B 0.94% 2.41% 0.94%
VLTO C 1.62% 1.32% 1.32%
XYL D 1.94% 2.14% 1.94%
CZA Overweight 91 Positions Relative to GSFP
Symbol Grade Weight
VMC B 2.4%
WAB B 2.18%
AVB B 2.11%
ETR B 2.06%
WTW B 2.04%
BRO B 1.98%
STT B 1.86%
EQR C 1.86%
PPG F 1.84%
DOV A 1.77%
LYB F 1.73%
FTV C 1.7%
KEYS A 1.7%
AEE A 1.58%
WRB A 1.53%
CINF A 1.53%
ES C 1.46%
NTRS A 1.44%
LPLA A 1.43%
TDY B 1.41%
IFF D 1.41%
PKG A 1.38%
LDOS C 1.38%
CSL C 1.31%
ESS B 1.3%
PFG D 1.3%
J D 1.3%
CHKP C 1.27%
FOX A 1.24%
AER A 1.24%
JBHT C 1.2%
BAH F 1.16%
CRBG B 1.16%
PNR A 1.12%
IEX C 1.11%
BAX F 1.1%
TRMB B 1.1%
WMG D 1.1%
MAS D 1.09%
WLK D 1.05%
GGG B 0.99%
UDR B 0.95%
AMCR C 0.94%
WES C 0.93%
GLPI C 0.89%
REG A 0.85%
CNA C 0.85%
PFGC B 0.83%
LOGI D 0.81%
NVT B 0.8%
WPC C 0.79%
ITT A 0.79%
EMN C 0.76%
RRX B 0.76%
AIZ A 0.73%
BWXT B 0.72%
ATR B 0.71%
CHDN B 0.69%
SEIC B 0.67%
AOS F 0.66%
WWD C 0.65%
CACI D 0.64%
ALSN B 0.64%
EHC B 0.62%
CR A 0.61%
INGR C 0.58%
KNTK A 0.58%
TFX F 0.58%
CHE D 0.53%
VOYA B 0.5%
IVZ B 0.5%
ESAB C 0.48%
BLCO B 0.47%
BPOP C 0.46%
OSK C 0.46%
FLS B 0.46%
MDU D 0.45%
ESI B 0.43%
AWI A 0.43%
IDA A 0.41%
FNB A 0.4%
ESNT F 0.39%
COLD D 0.39%
SLGN A 0.38%
SIGI C 0.38%
SNDR B 0.35%
CWEN C 0.35%
RRR F 0.34%
ACT C 0.34%
ST F 0.31%
FLO D 0.3%
CZA Underweight 18 Positions Relative to GSFP
Symbol Grade Weight
NEE C -5.09%
WM B -4.98%
DOCU B -3.73%
SW A -3.31%
TT A -2.95%
ITRI C -2.83%
WCN A -2.74%
ABBV F -2.48%
BLD D -2.19%
BALL F -2.15%
DAR C -1.9%
BE B -1.58%
ECL D -1.23%
ERII D -1.07%
APTV F -1.03%
WMS F -0.95%
ALB B -0.74%
OTLY F -0.19%
Compare ETFs