CSD vs. PWER ETF Comparison
Comparison of Guggenheim Spin-Off ETF (CSD) to Macquarie Energy Transition ETF (PWER)
CSD
Guggenheim Spin-Off ETF
CSD Description
The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the performance, before the fund's fees and expenses, of an equity index called the Beacon Spin-off Index. The fund invests at least 90% of its assets in common stock, ADRs and MLPs that comprise the index and depositary receipts representing common stocks included in the index. It generally will invest in all of the securities comprising the index in proportion to their weightings in the index. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$89.24
Average Daily Volume
2,229
24
PWER
Macquarie Energy Transition ETF
PWER Description
The ETF seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets, plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes, in a diversified portfolio of securities in the energy, materials, industrial, renewable energy, and utilities sectors that meet the fund"s investment criteria.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$29.34
Average Daily Volume
616
23
Performance
| Period | CSD | PWER |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 9.59% | -0.34% |
| 60 Days | 11.03% | 3.53% |
| 90 Days | 18.30% | 3.40% |
| 12 Months | 51.82% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in CSD | Weight in PWER | Overlap |
|---|
CSD Overweight 24 Positions Relative to PWER
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GEV | B | 8.93% | |
| VLTO | D | 6.56% | |
| GEHC | F | 6.5% | |
| CEG | D | 6.17% | |
| SOLV | C | 5.46% | |
| DTM | B | 5.19% | |
| ESAB | B | 5.17% | |
| KD | B | 5.03% | |
| CR | A | 5.0% | |
| GXO | B | 4.99% | |
| VNT | B | 4.92% | |
| KNF | A | 4.36% | |
| UHAL | D | 3.86% | |
| OGN | D | 3.16% | |
| RXO | C | 3.09% | |
| VSCO | B | 2.37% | |
| PHIN | A | 1.88% | |
| NATL | B | 1.82% | |
| FTRE | D | 1.48% | |
| CNXC | F | 1.47% | |
| VSTS | C | 1.37% | |
| VMEO | B | 0.82% | |
| EMBC | C | 0.69% | |
| CCSI | C | 0.37% |
CSD Underweight 23 Positions Relative to PWER
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA | B | -5.6% | |
| CF | B | -5.19% | |
| FSLR | F | -4.7% | |
| GNRC | B | -4.13% | |
| MP | B | -4.11% | |
| APD | A | -3.89% | |
| MPC | D | -3.6% | |
| VLO | C | -3.58% | |
| COP | C | -3.07% | |
| EQT | B | -3.0% | |
| RUN | F | -2.59% | |
| PR | B | -2.2% | |
| CHRD | D | -2.05% | |
| BKR | B | -2.04% | |
| SLB | C | -2.0% | |
| MTUS | C | -1.92% | |
| ENPH | F | -1.37% | |
| EOG | A | -1.12% | |
| STLD | B | -1.11% | |
| DAR | C | -1.05% | |
| FLNC | C | -1.03% | |
| OXY | D | -0.84% | |
| LEU | C | -0.69% |
CSD: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
PWER: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
