CQQQ vs. FDEM ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim China Technology ETF (CQQQ) to Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor ETF (FDEM)

CQQQ

Guggenheim China Technology ETF

CQQQ Description

The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the performance, before the fund's fees and expenses, of an equity index called the AlphaShares China Technology Index. The fund invests at least 80% of its assets in common stock, ADRs, ADSs, GDRs and IDRs that comprise the index and depositary receipts or shares representing common stocks included in the index. The index is designed to measure and monitor the performance of the universe of publicly-traded companies which are based in mainland China, Hong Kong or Macau, are in the Information Technology Sector, as defined by GICS and are open to foreign investment. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$46.56

Average Daily Volume

317,715

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

FDEM

Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor ETF

FDEM Description

The investment seeks to provide investment returns that correspond, before fees and expenses, generally to the performance of the Fidelity Targeted International Factor Index℠. The fund invests at least 80% of its assets in securities included in the index and in depository receipts representing securities included in the index. The index is designed to reflect the performance of stocks of large- and mid-capitalization developed international companies that have attractive valuations, high quality profiles, positive momentum signals, lower volatility than the broader developed international equity market, and lower correlation to the U.S. equity market.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.31

Average Daily Volume

26,869

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	CQQQ	FDEM
30 Days	45.50%	6.30%
60 Days	43.57%	8.94%
90 Days	35.27%	5.92%
12 Months	31.98%	29.24%

3 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in CQQQ	Weight in FDEM	Overlap
ATHM	A	1.58%	0.5%	0.5%
BIDU	B	6.85%	0.64%	0.64%
PDD	B	9.13%	0.85%	0.85%

CQQQ Overweight 4 Positions Relative to FDEM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
BILI	B	4.55%
GDS	B	1.74%
YY	C	0.89%
WB	B	0.55%

CQQQ Underweight 10 Positions Relative to FDEM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
BABA	A	-1.37%
CHT	C	-0.57%
BCH	D	-0.38%
TCOM	A	-0.32%
VALE	B	-0.28%
YUMC	B	-0.18%
WIT	C	-0.17%
VIPS	B	-0.1%
MNSO	B	-0.09%
LPL	D	-0.03%

CQQQ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords

Industries: Internet Content & Information Data Storage Specialty Retail