CIBR vs. LGHT ETF Comparison
Comparison of First Trust NASDAQ CEA Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) to Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT)
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ CEA Cybersecurity ETF
CIBR Description
The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield (before the fund's fees and expenses) of an equity index called the Nasdaq CEA Cybersecurity Index(SM) (the "index"). The index is owned by the NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. The index will include securities of companies classified as "cybersecurity" companies by the CEA. The fund will normally invest at least 90% of its net assets in common stocks or in depositary receipts that comprise the index. The advisor intends to invest in each security in the index. It is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$63.61
Average Daily Volume
483,957
28
LGHT
Langar Global HealthTech ETF
LGHT Description
LGHT targets the global healthcare technology industry. The fund actively invests in HealthTech companies, which the adviser defines as firms that develop technology designed to create healthcare efficiency by addressing key pain points for patients, providers, payors, and hospitals, including those companies that derive a majority of their revenue from HealthTech products and services. The portfolio construction starts by identifying companies that fit into the advisers HealthTech definition. The remaining companies are screened using a proprietary metric that assesses each firms financial health, involvement in relevant controversies, as well as the strength of its team and culture. Each company is then assigned an industry risk score through an algorithm that defines quantitative and qualitative risk categories and weights them accordingly. Finally, each company is reviewed by an investment committee. However, the portfolio manager still has full discretion over the final selection.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$10.42
Average Daily Volume
913
31
Performance
| Period | CIBR | LGHT |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 4.98% | -0.59% |
| 60 Days | 6.84% | -1.40% |
| 90 Days | 7.43% | -1.14% |
| 12 Months | 31.77% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in CIBR | Weight in LGHT | Overlap |
|---|
CIBR Overweight 28 Positions Relative to LGHT
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRWD | B | 9.36% | |
| CSCO | B | 8.64% | |
| PANW | C | 8.19% | |
| AVGO | D | 7.89% | |
| INFY | B | 7.06% | |
| FTNT | C | 4.64% | |
| NET | B | 4.22% | |
| GEN | B | 4.01% | |
| LDOS | C | 3.99% | |
| ZS | C | 3.93% | |
| BAH | F | 3.67% | |
| CHKP | D | 3.48% | |
| CYBR | B | 3.46% | |
| AKAM | D | 3.27% | |
| FFIV | B | 3.21% | |
| OKTA | C | 2.85% | |
| S | B | 2.16% | |
| OTEX | D | 1.97% | |
| SAIC | F | 1.54% | |
| VRNS | D | 1.46% | |
| QLYS | C | 1.31% | |
| TENB | C | 1.12% | |
| RBRK | A | 0.63% | |
| RPD | C | 0.59% | |
| NTCT | C | 0.37% | |
| ATEN | B | 0.28% | |
| OSPN | A | 0.25% | |
| RDWR | B | 0.25% |
CIBR Underweight 31 Positions Relative to LGHT
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISRG | A | -15.39% | |
| GEHC | F | -8.56% | |
| RMD | C | -6.71% | |
| IQV | D | -6.34% | |
| DXCM | D | -5.51% | |
| PODD | C | -5.26% | |
| VEEV | C | -5.15% | |
| PHG | D | -4.87% | |
| ZBH | C | -3.57% | |
| BNTX | D | -3.53% | |
| ALGN | F | -2.85% | |
| MASI | A | -2.46% | |
| DOCS | C | -2.06% | |
| MRNA | F | -1.72% | |
| PRCT | B | -1.27% | |
| ALKS | B | -0.66% | |
| TNDM | F | -0.54% | |
| IRTC | D | -0.44% | |
| PRVA | B | -0.44% | |
| OMCL | C | -0.42% | |
| LFST | C | -0.31% | |
| TDOC | C | -0.28% | |
| PGNY | F | -0.25% | |
| EVH | F | -0.22% | |
| SDGR | C | -0.21% | |
| GDRX | F | -0.2% | |
| ALHC | C | -0.2% | |
| PHR | F | -0.17% | |
| ACCD | D | -0.07% | |
| MODV | C | -0.03% | |
| TBRG | B | -0.03% |
CIBR: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
LGHT: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
