CANQ vs. GDMA ETF Comparison
Comparison of Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ) to Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA)
CANQ
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF
CANQ Description
The fund pursues its objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80%, but up to 100%, of its net assets (plus borrowings for investment purposes, if any) in a portfolio of equity instruments (including options and equity ETFs) and fixed income instruments (including bonds and fixed income ETFs) intended to deliver convertible security-like exposure to companies in the Nasdaq-100 Index. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$0.00
Average Daily Volume
503
5
GDMA
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
GDMA Description
The investment seeks total return. The fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing (i) approximately 80% of its total assets with exposure to a variety of asset classes, geographies, and market capitalizations generally based on a long-term view of macroeconomic factors and (ii) approximately 20% of its total assets to add or reduce exposure to one or more asset classes generally based on a short-term view of the market. It may invest in futures contracts to gain long or short exposure to one or more asset classes.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$32.46
Average Daily Volume
4,781
11
Performance
| Period | CANQ | GDMA |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 0.14% | -1.10% |
| 60 Days | 1.63% | 0.75% |
| 90 Days | 2.53% | 2.47% |
| 12 Months | 10.92% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in CANQ | Weight in GDMA | Overlap |
|---|
CANQ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
GDMA: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
