CANE vs. SPAM ETF Comparison
Comparison of Teucrium Sugar Fund ETV (CANE) to Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM)
CANE
Teucrium Sugar Fund ETV
CANE Description
The investment seeks to replicate, net of expenses, the performance of ICE Sugar Futures Contracts. The fund seeks to have the daily changes in percentage terms of the shares' net asset value (NAV) reflect the daily changes in percentage terms of a weighted average of the closing settlement prices for three futures contracts for sugar that are traded on ICE Futures US, specifically: (1) the second-to-expire Sugar No. 11 Futures Contract, weighted 35%, (2) the third-to-expire Sugar No. 11 Futures Contract, weighted 30%, and (3) the Sugar No. 11 Futures Contract expiring in the March following the expiration month of the third-to-expire contract, weighted 35%.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$12.29
Average Daily Volume
40,307
2
SPAM
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
SPAM Description
The index is designed to provide exposure to companies that have business operations in the cybersecurity industry. The fund will invest, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets, plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes, in securities that comprise the index and in American Depositary Receipts ("ADRs") and Global Depositary Receipts ("GDRs") based on the securities in the index. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$27.54
Average Daily Volume
509
8
Performance
Period | CANE | SPAM |
---|---|---|
30 Days | 6.09% | 6.88% |
60 Days | 3.24% | 3.07% |
90 Days | -8.04% | 1.42% |
12 Months | -5.21% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol | Grade | Weight in CANE | Weight in SPAM | Overlap |
---|
CANE: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
SPAM: Top Represented Industries & Keywords