CANE vs. SPAM ETF Comparison

Comparison of Teucrium Sugar Fund ETV (CANE) to Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM)
CANE

Teucrium Sugar Fund ETV

CANE Description

The investment seeks to replicate, net of expenses, the performance of ICE Sugar Futures Contracts. The fund seeks to have the daily changes in percentage terms of the shares' net asset value (NAV) reflect the daily changes in percentage terms of a weighted average of the closing settlement prices for three futures contracts for sugar that are traded on ICE Futures US, specifically: (1) the second-to-expire Sugar No. 11 Futures Contract, weighted 35%, (2) the third-to-expire Sugar No. 11 Futures Contract, weighted 30%, and (3) the Sugar No. 11 Futures Contract expiring in the March following the expiration month of the third-to-expire contract, weighted 35%.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$12.29

Average Daily Volume

40,307

Number of Holdings *

2

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
SPAM

Themes Cybersecurity ETF

SPAM Description The index is designed to provide exposure to companies that have business operations in the cybersecurity industry. The fund will invest, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets, plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes, in securities that comprise the index and in American Depositary Receipts ("ADRs") and Global Depositary Receipts ("GDRs") based on the securities in the index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.54

Average Daily Volume

509

Number of Holdings *

8

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period CANE SPAM
30 Days 6.09% 6.88%
60 Days 3.24% 3.07%
90 Days -8.04% 1.42%
12 Months -5.21%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in CANE Weight in SPAM Overlap
Compare ETFs