BUSA vs. FFLG ETF Comparison

Comparison of Brandes U.S. Value ETF (BUSA) to Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG)

BUSA

Brandes U.S. Value ETF

BUSA Description

The fund is an actively managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF") that seeks to attain its investment objective by investing primarily in equity securities of U.S. companies. Under normal market conditions, the fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes), measured at the time of purchase, in securities of U.S. companies.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$29.67

Average Daily Volume

28,935

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

FFLG

Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF

FFLG Description

FFLG seeks to achieve long-term capital growth by investing in large-cap companies believed to have above-average growth potential. The adviser generally defines large-caps as companies with similar market capitalizations to Russell 1000 or S&P 500 companies. Growth is measured based on factors such as earnings or revenue. Stocks are selected using fundamental analysis of factors such as financial condition and industry position of each issuer, as well as market and economic conditions. The adviser then incorporates a quantitative portfolio construction process to emphasize securities in which the adviser has high conviction, subject to risk, liquidity, and trading characteristics. The fund invests in both US and non-US companies. Despite its large-cap focus, the fund's strategy can lead to investments in small- and mid-cap companies. Before February 26, 2024, the fund traded as Fidelity Growth Opportunities ETF under the ticker FGRO. The fund previously used a semitransparent ETF structure

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$24.32

Average Daily Volume

48,538

Number of Holdings ^*

100

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	BUSA	FFLG
30 Days	-0.54%	5.37%
60 Days	-0.10%	10.70%
90 Days	-2.75%	11.08%
12 Months		45.98%

2 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in BUSA	Weight in FFLG	Overlap
	FLEX	D	2.48%	1.84%	1.84%
	GOOG	A	2.8%	4.66%	2.8%

BUSA Overweight 8 Positions Relative to FFLG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CVX	D	3.7%
BAC	B	3.07%
WFC	C	2.97%
HAL	F	2.75%
MRK	C	2.71%
FI	C	2.67%
CMCSA	F	2.55%
DOX	D	2.42%

BUSA Underweight 98 Positions Relative to FFLG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
MSFT	A	-10.56%
NVDA	B	-7.82%
META	A	-5.36%
AMZN	A	-5.21%
UBER	B	-3.45%
TMUS	B	-2.86%
GOOGL	A	-2.8%
ROKU	C	-2.65%
AAPL	A	-2.2%
UNH	D	-2.14%
AMD	B	-1.93%
ON	C	-1.9%
BSX	B	-1.88%
SQ	C	-1.85%
NXPI	B	-1.81%
SE	B	-1.73%
V	C	-1.57%
GPN	D	-1.32%
LLY	A	-1.25%
VRT	C	-1.2%
LPLA	B	-1.04%
ADBE	B	-1.01%
FND	F	-0.97%
MDB	D	-0.92%
ORCL	A	-0.91%
HUM	C	-0.89%
MQ	C	-0.87%
SNAP	B	-0.87%
EPAM	F	-0.86%
NOW	A	-0.84%
MRVL	C	-0.8%
CRM	C	-0.77%
BA	C	-0.74%
ZI	F	-0.68%
DT	F	-0.67%
CVNA	B	-0.66%
PCG	D	-0.64%
DDOG	B	-0.64%
TSM	A	-0.64%
MA	C	-0.59%
INTU	A	-0.58%
HUBS	C	-0.55%
CYTK	D	-0.55%
NFLX	A	-0.55%
PEN	D	-0.54%
DLO	F	-0.51%
CNC	D	-0.5%
CEG	B	-0.49%
JBL	F	-0.47%
AGL	D	-0.46%
TMDX	A	-0.46%
TMO	D	-0.42%
BJ	B	-0.4%
PCVX	B	-0.4%
LOW	D	-0.4%
DHR	D	-0.38%
AMT	B	-0.38%
INTA	C	-0.36%
AR	D	-0.34%
LYFT	F	-0.29%
MGNI	B	-0.29%
GFS	C	-0.28%
AMAT	B	-0.26%
LITE	B	-0.26%
ACVA	C	-0.25%
DV	D	-0.23%
ARGX	B	-0.22%
OVV	D	-0.22%
CLDX	F	-0.22%
PANW	B	-0.19%
LULU	F	-0.17%
ETN	C	-0.17%
COHR	B	-0.16%
PSTG	B	-0.15%
BE	D	-0.14%
KO	A	-0.14%
APO	B	-0.12%
NUVL	C	-0.11%
MRNA	D	-0.1%
ACN	D	-0.1%
NVO	B	-0.1%
REGN	B	-0.1%
ALNY	A	-0.1%
CHTR	C	-0.09%
ZNTL	F	-0.08%
KROS	F	-0.07%
ALXO	F	-0.06%
SNOW	D	-0.06%
W	D	-0.05%
ANET	A	-0.05%
FSLR	C	-0.05%
AVGO	B	-0.04%
VLTO	D	-0.04%
ARM	A	-0.03%
LEN	D	-0.02%
TSLA	B	-0.01%
ASND	B	-0.0%
ALHC	B	-0.0%