BLCV vs. SAEF ETF Comparison

Comparison of BlackRock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) to Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF)

BLCV

BlackRock Large Cap Value ETF

BLCV Description

Under normal circumstances, the fund seeks to invest at least 80% of its net assets plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes in large cap equity securities and derivatives that have similar economic characteristics to such securities. The fund invests primarily in equity securities that BFA believes are undervalued, which means that their prices are less than BFA believes they are worth. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$33.27

Average Daily Volume

3,345

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

SAEF

Schwab Ariel ESG ETF

SAEF Description

Schwab Ariel ESG ETF is an exchange traded fund launched and managed by Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc. The fund is co-managed by Ariel Investments, LLC. It invests in the public equity markets of the United States. The fund invests in stocks of companies operating across diversified sectors. It invests in growth and value stocks of diverse market cap companies, within the market capitalization range of the Russell 2500 Index. The fund invests in stocks of companies that are deemed socially conscious in their business dealings and directly promote environmental responsibility. It employs fundamental and quantitative analysis with bottom-up stock picking approach to create its portfolio. It employs proprietary research to create its portfolio. Schwab Ariel ESG ETF was formed on November 16, 2021 and is domiciled in the United States.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$28.64

Average Daily Volume

2,718

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	BLCV	SAEF
30 Days	0.80%	4.74%
60 Days	2.55%	6.56%
90 Days	3.69%	11.13%
12 Months	25.04%	37.37%

2 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in BLCV	Weight in SAEF	Overlap
	DNB	A	1.98%	1.5%	1.5%
	LH	B	2.07%	1.23%	1.23%

BLCV Overweight 54 Positions Relative to SAEF

Symbol	Grade	Weight
WFC	A	4.18%
C	B	3.58%
CAH	B	3.19%
SSNC	C	2.94%
CSCO	B	2.79%
LHX	B	2.73%
FCNCA	A	2.62%
MDT	D	2.5%
CMCSA	B	2.48%
LDOS	C	2.4%
CTSH	B	2.3%
CVS	D	2.24%
ICE	D	2.23%
AMZN	B	2.23%
MSFT	D	2.2%
FIS	C	2.19%
EA	A	2.08%
BAX	F	1.99%
EPD	A	1.96%
JCI	B	1.95%
GM	B	1.94%
RTX	D	1.85%
CI	D	1.85%
WAB	B	1.79%
SRE	A	1.76%
HES	B	1.62%
KHC	F	1.59%
HPQ	B	1.58%
EXC	C	1.58%
CCI	C	1.51%
D	C	1.44%
AIG	D	1.41%
PPG	F	1.37%
VZ	C	1.36%
KOS	D	1.33%
APD	A	1.32%
WDC	F	1.32%
STZ	D	1.21%
APTV	F	1.2%
FNF	D	1.18%
WTW	B	1.14%
KDP	D	1.12%
V	A	1.11%
ELV	F	1.06%
TPR	B	1.05%
IFF	D	1.02%
LLY	F	0.98%
BTI	A	0.93%
DLTR	F	0.9%
SEE	D	0.81%
BA	D	0.79%
DG	F	0.59%
VOYA	B	0.49%
FTRE	D	0.42%

BLCV Underweight 55 Positions Relative to SAEF

Symbol	Grade	Weight
OSW	B	-4.39%
BCO	F	-4.21%
NCLH	B	-3.64%
FI	A	-3.4%
LIND	B	-3.32%
KKR	B	-2.42%
FAF	A	-2.41%
GNRC	B	-2.41%
ZBRA	B	-2.3%
NVT	C	-2.29%
JLL	D	-2.28%
GS	B	-2.24%
REZI	A	-2.14%
NTRS	A	-2.09%
FICO	A	-2.08%
PBH	A	-2.04%
MAT	D	-1.81%
KMT	C	-1.8%
CBRE	B	-1.79%
CRL	D	-1.78%
GNTX	F	-1.76%
MIDD	D	-1.71%
KEYS	A	-1.65%
LFUS	D	-1.57%
WEX	F	-1.54%
KN	B	-1.53%
MTB	A	-1.53%
AXTA	B	-1.41%
MSI	A	-1.41%
MANU	C	-1.41%
NVST	C	-1.31%
MAS	D	-1.29%
BIO	C	-1.28%
MSGS	A	-1.26%
ZBH	C	-1.25%
ADTN	B	-1.24%
MHK	D	-1.22%
IPG	D	-1.22%
SSD	D	-1.21%
ST	F	-1.21%
SNA	B	-1.19%
BRC	C	-1.16%
ATGE	B	-1.15%
AFL	C	-1.13%
MSGE	F	-1.1%
BWA	D	-1.09%
KMX	C	-0.98%
KFY	B	-0.97%
SJM	D	-0.94%
PGR	B	-0.92%
REYN	D	-0.91%
LESL	D	-0.86%
HCKT	B	-0.83%
PARA	D	-0.56%
PHIN	A	-0.28%