BDVG vs. QLTY ETF Comparison

Comparison of IMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) to GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY)

BDVG

IMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF

BDVG Description

The fund is an actively-managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF") that seeks to achieve its objective by investing at least 80% of its net assets, plus borrowings for investment purposes, in common stocks of U.S. companies that pay dividends annually, with an emphasis on stocks that have a strong track record of paying quarterly dividends or that are expected to increase their dividends over the next one to five years.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$12.21

Average Daily Volume

5,955

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

QLTY

GMO U.S. Quality ETF

QLTY Description

QLTY seeks total return by investing in US companies deemed high quality. These companies are defined as having established businesses capable of delivering substantial returns on past investments, utilizing cash flows for high-return investments, or returning cash to shareholders through dividends or share buybacks. The investment strategy combines systematic factors like profitability and leverage, alongside judgmental factors such as assessments of future profitability and growth prospects. It may also use various valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow analysis and multiples of price-to-earnings, revenues, book values, or other fundamental metrics, to acquire underrated stocks. Additionally, the fund may invest in other ETFs. The fund may also invest in the GMO U.S. Treasury Fund, and money market funds. Investment decisions are not constrained by portfolio turnover rates or benchmark considerations.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$32.95

Average Daily Volume

266,826

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	BDVG	QLTY
30 Days	4.85%	2.81%
60 Days	5.16%	1.23%
90 Days	6.72%	4.11%
12 Months	24.23%	28.31%

7 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in BDVG	Weight in QLTY	Overlap
AAPL	A	4.24%	5.33%	4.24%
ABT	B	1.88%	4.17%	1.88%
JNJ	D	1.95%	4.24%	1.95%
MDLZ	F	2.4%	1.72%	1.72%
MRK	D	2.41%	2.41%	2.41%
MSFT	C	4.17%	6.46%	4.17%
PG	A	1.96%	3.2%	1.96%

BDVG Overweight 29 Positions Relative to QLTY

Symbol	Grade	Weight
JPM	B	4.27%
ABBV	D	4.2%
CVX	A	4.14%
NUE	D	3.87%
LMT	D	3.81%
WMT	A	3.57%
QCOM	F	3.38%
NSC	A	3.07%
BAC	A	3.06%
WM	A	3.06%
PPL	A	2.98%
MCD	D	2.82%
LOW	C	2.79%
CSCO	A	2.77%
CB	C	2.47%
EMR	A	2.44%
PNC	A	2.28%
KMI	B	2.06%
HON	B	1.99%
BMY	B	1.88%
PEP	F	1.87%
DE	B	1.86%
SCHW	A	1.74%
MTB	B	1.71%
EOG	C	1.43%
GIS	D	1.39%
WPC	D	1.37%
PFE	D	1.06%
HSY	F	0.84%

BDVG Underweight 27 Positions Relative to QLTY

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ORCL	B	-4.71%
META	D	-4.5%
GOOGL	C	-4.43%
UNH	B	-3.62%
TXN	D	-3.53%
ACN	B	-3.3%
V	A	-3.22%
ISRG	B	-2.92%
KLAC	D	-2.85%
LRCX	F	-2.85%
CRM	B	-2.84%
KO	D	-2.81%
HLT	A	-2.62%
ARMK	A	-2.56%
ELV	F	-2.5%
WFC	A	-2.45%
AVGO	D	-2.45%
AMZN	B	-2.4%
USB	A	-2.31%
OTIS	C	-2.25%
TJX	A	-2.14%
GE	C	-1.73%
LLY	D	-1.61%
STZ	F	-1.59%
CI	D	-1.49%
DGX	B	-1.35%
TMO	F	-0.91%