BAMU vs. GHTA ETF Comparison

Comparison of Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) to Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA)
BAMU

Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF

BAMU Description

The fund is an actively managed exchange traded fund ("ETF") that, under normal circumstances, invests at least 80% of its net assets in U.S. Treasuries and investment grade corporate bonds with a 0-2 year maturity range, including unaffiliated ETFs purchased in the secondary market that invest substantially all of their assets in such fixed income instruments.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.34

Average Daily Volume

6,713

Number of Holdings *

5

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
GHTA

Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF

GHTA Description Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF seeks to provide total return. The fund is an actively managed ETF that invests in a combination of equity and fixed income ETFs. The underlying funds in which the fund invests each primarily invest in (1) U.S. common, preferred, or convertible stocks, (2) foreign common, preferred, or convertible stocks, (3) emerging market common, preferred, or convertible stocks, (4) U.S. fixed income securities, (5) real estate investment trusts, (6) master-limited partnerships, and (7) agency and mortgage backed securities.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$29.95

Average Daily Volume

5,851

Number of Holdings *

8

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period BAMU GHTA
30 Days 0.44% 5.25%
60 Days 0.55% 7.94%
90 Days 1.14% 7.67%
12 Months 4.41% 23.06%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in BAMU Weight in GHTA Overlap
BIL B 19.41% 3.29% 3.29%
Compare ETFs