BAMB vs. FAIL ETF Comparison

Comparison of Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF (BAMB) to Cambria Global Tail Risk ETF (FAIL)
BAMB

Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF

BAMB Description

The fund is an actively managed exchange traded fund ("ETF") that, under normal circumstances, invests at least 80% of its net assets in U.S. Treasuries and investment grade corporate bonds with a 0-10 year weighted average maturity range, including unaffiliated ETFs purchased in the secondary market that invest substantially all of their assets in such fixed income instruments.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.91

Average Daily Volume

7,534

Number of Holdings *

3

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
FAIL

Cambria Global Tail Risk ETF

FAIL Description The Cambria Tail Risk ETF seeks to mitigate significant downside market risk. The Fund intends to invest in a portfolio of "out of the money" put options purchased on the U.S. stock market. TAIL strategy offers the potential advantage of buying more puts when volatility is low and fewer puts when volatility is high. While a portion of the fund's assets will be invested in the basket of long put option premiums, the majority of fund assets will be invested in intermediate term US Treasuries. As the fund is designed to be a hedge against market declines and rising volatility, Cambria expects the fund to produce negative returns in the most years with rising markets or declining volatility.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$16.42

Average Daily Volume

743

Number of Holdings *

1

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period BAMB FAIL
30 Days -1.11% -0.58%
60 Days -3.00% -2.95%
90 Days -2.14% -2.44%
12 Months 4.85% -8.13%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in BAMB Weight in FAIL Overlap
IEF F 19.8% 24.07% 19.8%
BAMB Overweight 2 Positions Relative to FAIL
Symbol Grade Weight
IEI D 19.81%
SCHR D 19.76%
BAMB Underweight 0 Positions Relative to FAIL
Symbol Grade Weight
Compare ETFs