AMID vs. QQQG ETF Comparison

Comparison of Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) to Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG)

AMID

Argent Mid Cap ETF

AMID Description

AMID aims to outperform the Russell MidCap Index over the long term by applying Change-Based Investing strategies. The fund actively invests in stocks undergoing positive internal or external change, which the issuer believes could lead to underappreciated growth. The starting universe begins with 1,500 US mid-cap stocks that are screened for liquidity and grouped by sector. Using their proprietary Argent Alpha Model, stocks are ranked under four main categories: Value, Growth, Quality, and Stability. Stocks within each sector with positive exposure to outperforming factors are considered. The remaining companies are grouped into current and future market segments based on expected outperformance in the current or future market cycle. Finally, the fund uses fundamental analysis to select 35-50 stocks with prospect improvements at the company or industry level. Sectors may be overweighted at various times in the economic cycle. Individual securities are capped at 8%.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$35.13

Average Daily Volume

11,904

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

QQQG

Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF

QQQG Description

The initial Index universe is typically derived from the component companies of the Nasdaq-100 Index®. The initial universe of companies is typically screened based on their average projected free cash flows and earnings (if available) over each of the next two fiscal years. Under normal circumstances, the fund will seek to invest at least 80% of the fund"s total assets in growth securities. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$20.63

Average Daily Volume

3,597

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	AMID	QQQG
30 Days	0.69%	-0.45%
60 Days	6.58%
90 Days	9.09%
12 Months	36.91%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in AMID	Weight in QQQG	Overlap
	CTAS	B	3.54%	3.3%	3.3%

AMID Overweight 9 Positions Relative to QQQG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
FICO	A	5.5%
CDW	D	3.72%
BLDR	B	3.44%
DHI	C	3.43%
CPRT	B	3.43%
HCA	B	2.97%
MEDP	F	2.97%
CBZ	F	2.89%
HLI	C	2.84%

AMID Underweight 9 Positions Relative to QQQG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
NVDA	C	-4.98%
KLAC	B	-4.94%
TTD	C	-4.49%
AVGO	C	-4.47%
FANG	D	-3.72%
AMAT	B	-3.71%
NXPI	F	-3.34%
QCOM	D	-3.13%
ADI	C	-3.06%