SIL vs. MGNR ETF Comparison
Comparison of Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) to American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR)
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
SIL Description
The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the Solactive Global Silver Miners Index. The fund invests at least 80% of its total assets in the securities of the underlying index and in ADRs and GDRs based on the securities in the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to measure broad based equity market performance of global companies involved in the silver mining industry. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$36.05
Average Daily Volume
885,170
7
MGNR
American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF
MGNR Description
MGNR offers exposure to companies involved in various aspects of natural resources, including ownership, production, refining, processing, transportation, distribution, mining, exploration, storage, and related activities. In addition, it broadly defines natural resources, encompassing metals, agricultural products, timber, water, and energy from both fossil fuel and renewable sources, as well as chemicals. With a concentrated portfolio ranging from 30 to 60 global stocks, the fund primarily targets large and mid-cap stocks. The fund prioritizes firms with a track record of historical growth performance by combining top-down and bottom-up analyses, a commodities viewpoint with sub-sector selection, and bottom-up stock picking. Both growth and value investment styles are also incorporated. Holdings are divested based on changing market conditions, company performance, and valuation, aiming to optimize gains and minimize losses. The fund may invest in foreign currencies directly.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$32.72
Average Daily Volume
18,379
23
Performance
Period | SIL | MGNR |
---|---|---|
30 Days | -10.72% | 6.59% |
60 Days | 2.59% | 8.67% |
90 Days | 6.63% | 11.27% |
12 Months | 40.49% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol | Grade | Weight in SIL | Weight in MGNR | Overlap | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDE | D | 4.46% | 2.43% | 2.43% |
SIL Underweight 22 Positions Relative to MGNR
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
TRGP | B | -4.65% | |
SW | A | -3.7% | |
AA | B | -3.51% | |
PR | B | -3.48% | |
FANG | D | -3.16% | |
KNTK | B | -2.96% | |
X | C | -2.75% | |
FLNC | C | -2.35% | |
BRBR | A | -2.18% | |
GEV | B | -2.12% | |
DAR | C | -2.12% | |
CENX | B | -2.1% | |
AR | B | -2.01% | |
FSLR | F | -1.95% | |
CF | B | -1.72% | |
INGR | B | -1.66% | |
AGRO | D | -1.65% | |
PRIM | A | -1.46% | |
CC | C | -1.39% | |
CTVA | C | -1.07% | |
NEM | D | -1.03% | |
RRC | B | -0.98% |
SIL: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
MGNR: Top Represented Industries & Keywords