RSPH vs. RUNN ETF Comparison
Comparison of Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH) to Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN)
RSPH
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF
RSPH Description
The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the underlying index. The underlying index is composed of all of the components of the S&P 500® Health Care Index, an index that contains the common stocks of all companies included in the S&P 500® Index that are classified as members of the health care sector, as defined according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS).
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$30.68
Average Daily Volume
61,343
61
RUNN
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF
RUNN Description
The fund is in an actively managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF"). Under normal circumstances, the fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in exchange-traded equity securities of large and mid-sized U.S. companies with market capitalizations of at least $5 billion. The fund is roughly equally-weighted with 50-75 stocks typically held in the portfolio. The fund may invest up to 20% of net assets in non-U.S. companies. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$35.03
Average Daily Volume
42,104
55
Performance
| Period | RSPH | RUNN |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -1.00% | 3.98% |
| 60 Days | -4.48% | 5.29% |
| 90 Days | -3.57% | 7.85% |
| 12 Months | 12.19% | 31.92% |
RSPH Overweight 54 Positions Relative to RUNN
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| INCY | C | 2.08% | |
| BMY | B | 2.02% | |
| MCK | B | 2.0% | |
| WAT | B | 1.96% | |
| WST | C | 1.91% | |
| PODD | C | 1.9% | |
| GILD | C | 1.89% | |
| ISRG | A | 1.86% | |
| VTRS | A | 1.84% | |
| DXCM | D | 1.83% | |
| LH | C | 1.83% | |
| CAH | B | 1.82% | |
| ZBH | C | 1.74% | |
| DGX | A | 1.73% | |
| COR | B | 1.72% | |
| VRTX | F | 1.69% | |
| ABT | B | 1.68% | |
| CTLT | B | 1.68% | |
| CRL | C | 1.68% | |
| SOLV | C | 1.65% | |
| TECH | D | 1.65% | |
| EW | C | 1.64% | |
| RVTY | F | 1.62% | |
| GEHC | F | 1.62% | |
| MDT | D | 1.62% | |
| HOLX | D | 1.62% | |
| HSIC | B | 1.61% | |
| A | D | 1.61% | |
| CVS | D | 1.61% | |
| DVA | B | 1.6% | |
| RMD | C | 1.58% | |
| JNJ | D | 1.56% | |
| ALGN | D | 1.55% | |
| ZTS | D | 1.55% | |
| MTD | D | 1.52% | |
| PFE | D | 1.51% | |
| AMGN | D | 1.51% | |
| HUM | C | 1.5% | |
| HCA | F | 1.49% | |
| TMO | F | 1.48% | |
| DHR | F | 1.48% | |
| ABBV | D | 1.48% | |
| UHS | D | 1.47% | |
| MOH | F | 1.45% | |
| IDXX | F | 1.44% | |
| MRK | F | 1.44% | |
| LLY | F | 1.44% | |
| BIIB | F | 1.43% | |
| BAX | D | 1.36% | |
| TFX | F | 1.32% | |
| CNC | D | 1.32% | |
| ELV | F | 1.26% | |
| REGN | F | 1.15% | |
| MRNA | F | 0.99% |
RSPH Underweight 48 Positions Relative to RUNN
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HON | B | -1.9% | |
| J | F | -1.86% | |
| CW | B | -1.86% | |
| FDS | B | -1.86% | |
| AME | A | -1.86% | |
| ETN | A | -1.86% | |
| WSO | A | -1.86% | |
| PH | A | -1.85% | |
| PRI | A | -1.85% | |
| FI | A | -1.85% | |
| TXRH | C | -1.84% | |
| ITT | A | -1.83% | |
| GWW | B | -1.83% | |
| LDOS | C | -1.83% | |
| TDY | B | -1.83% | |
| EME | C | -1.82% | |
| RBA | A | -1.82% | |
| ADP | B | -1.82% | |
| V | A | -1.82% | |
| BR | A | -1.81% | |
| SAIA | B | -1.79% | |
| ACN | C | -1.79% | |
| BRO | B | -1.78% | |
| DRI | B | -1.78% | |
| NSC | B | -1.77% | |
| GD | F | -1.76% | |
| IR | B | -1.75% | |
| DECK | A | -1.75% | |
| RSG | A | -1.74% | |
| GGG | B | -1.74% | |
| FELE | B | -1.74% | |
| CACI | D | -1.74% | |
| GOOG | C | -1.72% | |
| APD | A | -1.72% | |
| CSL | C | -1.72% | |
| SSNC | B | -1.71% | |
| TSCO | D | -1.71% | |
| NVT | B | -1.71% | |
| TJX | A | -1.71% | |
| ROP | B | -1.7% | |
| AJG | B | -1.68% | |
| TTC | D | -1.68% | |
| DOX | D | -1.65% | |
| MMC | B | -1.64% | |
| ICE | C | -1.6% | |
| AVY | D | -1.59% | |
| FCN | D | -1.57% | |
| ICLR | D | -1.52% |
RSPH: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
RUNN: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
