MFEM vs. IGTR ETF Comparison

Comparison of PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) to Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF (IGTR)

MFEM

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF

MFEM Description

The investment seeks to track the investment results of the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Index. The fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its total assets (exclusive of collateral held from securities lending) in the component securities of the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Index. The underlying index is constructed by RAFI Indices, LLC using a rules-based approach to construct factor portfolios within the underlying index. The underlying index consists of factor portfolios, each of which emphasizes one of the following factors: value, low volatility, quality and momentum.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$19.65

Average Daily Volume

11,427

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

IGTR

Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF

IGTR Description

Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF is an exchange traded fund launched and managed by Innovator Capital Management, LLC. The fund is co-managed by Gradient Investments, LLC and Penserra Capital Management LLC. The fund invests in the public equity markets of global region. The fund invests in stocks of companies operating across diversified sectors. The fund invests in momentum and volatile stocks of companies across diversified market capitalization. It employs fundamental analysis with top-down stock picking approach to create its portfolio. Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF is domiciled in United States.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.70

Average Daily Volume

15,173

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	MFEM	IGTR
30 Days	-2.92%	-3.26%
60 Days	-0.81%	-8.89%
90 Days	-1.06%	-10.00%
12 Months	12.05%	11.50%

5 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in MFEM	Weight in IGTR	Overlap
CHT	D	0.4%	0.3%	0.3%
GGB	C	0.15%	0.43%	0.15%
PDD	F	0.25%	0.93%	0.25%
VALE	F	0.54%	0.59%	0.54%
YUMC	C	0.1%	0.58%	0.1%

MFEM Overweight 18 Positions Relative to IGTR

Symbol	Grade	Weight
SHG	D	0.68%
TME	D	0.46%
KB	B	0.42%
KT	A	0.33%
KEP	B	0.32%
SKM	D	0.27%
VIPS	F	0.23%
BCH	F	0.16%
LPL	F	0.13%
BRFS	D	0.13%
SBSW	D	0.11%
SGRP	D	0.09%
FN	D	0.09%
CAR	C	0.05%
SBLK	F	0.05%
SIMO	D	0.04%
ZTO	F	0.04%
AKO.A	F	0.02%

MFEM Underweight 13 Positions Relative to IGTR

Symbol	Grade	Weight
HDB	C	-5.45%
IBN	C	-3.78%
INFY	B	-3.27%
BABA	D	-2.77%
NU	C	-0.91%
TCOM	B	-0.69%
BIDU	F	-0.57%
BAP	B	-0.52%
LI	F	-0.35%
BGNE	D	-0.34%
UMC	F	-0.3%
YALA	D	-0.3%
NIO	F	-0.23%