HAIL vs. XHS ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) to SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS)
HAIL

SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF

HAIL Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho Smart Transportation Index. Under normal market conditions, the fund generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index is comprised of U.S.-listed equity securities (including depositary receipts) of companies domiciled across developed and emerging markets worldwide which are included in the Smart Transportation sector as determined by a classification standard produced by the index provider. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$28.16

Average Daily Volume

2,987

Number of Holdings *

68

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
XHS

SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

XHS Description The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$95.54

Average Daily Volume

3,976

Number of Holdings *

58

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period HAIL XHS
30 Days 2.61% 2.23%
60 Days 2.82% -1.36%
90 Days 2.09% -3.31%
12 Months 3.25% 12.13%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in HAIL Weight in XHS Overlap
HAIL Overweight 68 Positions Relative to XHS
Symbol Grade Weight
AUR C 3.83%
TSLA B 3.17%
XPEV C 3.04%
ALSN B 2.86%
PSNY F 2.45%
CMI A 2.43%
GM B 2.13%
NVDA C 2.11%
LI F 2.11%
LYFT C 2.08%
EH F 2.01%
PAR B 1.92%
ANSS B 1.9%
AMBA B 1.84%
BWA D 1.81%
NIO F 1.8%
UBER D 1.76%
CAR C 1.7%
GTX D 1.62%
ON D 1.59%
RIVN F 1.56%
GRAB B 1.55%
VC D 1.55%
AXL C 1.52%
AIOT B 1.51%
MOD A 1.5%
TRMB B 1.49%
OUST C 1.47%
THRM D 1.46%
HEI B 1.45%
LCID F 1.42%
HMC F 1.42%
QCOM F 1.37%
REVG B 1.34%
APTV D 1.3%
IRDM D 1.29%
LAZR F 1.28%
PCAR B 1.28%
MT B 1.21%
PLUG F 1.21%
ALGM D 1.21%
TXT D 1.19%
ITUB F 1.19%
VNT B 1.19%
DAN D 1.12%
F C 1.09%
INDI C 1.08%
MVIS F 1.07%
BIDU F 1.06%
STM F 1.03%
TM D 1.01%
ST F 0.98%
INTC D 0.97%
HII D 0.95%
LEA D 0.95%
NXPI D 0.92%
BLDE D 0.9%
ASPN F 0.89%
BLNK F 0.85%
HY D 0.83%
BLBD D 0.8%
STLA F 0.73%
ENPH F 0.56%
REKR F 0.51%
GOEV F 0.48%
ITRN B 0.36%
SEDG F 0.34%
INVZ F 0.33%
HAIL Underweight 58 Positions Relative to XHS
Symbol Grade Weight
HIMS B -2.63%
HQY B -2.56%
RDNT B -2.5%
MCK B -2.46%
GH B -2.36%
PINC B -2.35%
EHC B -2.27%
LH C -2.26%
CAH B -2.24%
SEM B -2.21%
DGX A -2.13%
RCM F -2.12%
COR B -2.12%
THC D -2.1%
PRVA B -2.1%
UNH C -2.09%
CHE D -2.05%
ENSG D -2.0%
CVS D -1.99%
DVA B -1.98%
HSIC B -1.98%
ADUS D -1.96%
AMED F -1.95%
PDCO D -1.87%
CI F -1.86%
HUM C -1.84%
HCA F -1.83%
UHS D -1.81%
MOH F -1.79%
USPH B -1.7%
SGRY F -1.67%
CRVL A -1.65%
CNC D -1.63%
ELV F -1.55%
BKD D -1.48%
OMI F -1.48%
NEO C -1.45%
OPCH D -1.45%
MD B -1.41%
AHCO F -1.25%
CLOV D -1.25%
CSTL D -1.24%
LFST C -1.24%
PGNY F -1.21%
ALHC C -1.14%
AMN F -1.06%
ACHC F -1.05%
NHC C -1.02%
ASTH D -1.01%
AGL F -1.01%
PNTG D -0.71%
ACCD D -0.64%
OPK C -0.64%
CYH F -0.63%
CCRN F -0.59%
MODV C -0.52%
FLGT F -0.42%
NRC F -0.31%
Compare ETFs