FITE vs. XHS ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE) to SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS)

FITE

SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

FITE Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho Future Security Index. Under normal market conditions, the fund generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index is comprised of U.S.-listed equity securities (including depositary receipts) of companies domiciled across developed and emerging markets worldwide which are included in the Future Security sector as determined by a classification standard produced by the index provider. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$68.36

Average Daily Volume

4,275

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

XHS

SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

XHS Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$95.54

Average Daily Volume

3,976

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	FITE	XHS
30 Days	9.61%	2.23%
60 Days	12.06%	-1.36%
90 Days	12.42%	-3.31%
12 Months	36.77%	12.13%

0 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in FITE	Weight in XHS	Overlap

FITE Overweight 60 Positions Relative to XHS

Symbol	Grade	Weight
RKLB	B	5.8%
FTNT	C	2.32%
S	B	2.19%
FFIV	B	2.1%
PSN	D	2.08%
KTOS	B	1.94%
LDOS	C	1.92%
MOG.A	B	1.88%
CSCO	B	1.86%
PANW	C	1.8%
OII	B	1.8%
NET	B	1.79%
VRNS	D	1.79%
TDY	B	1.76%
NOC	D	1.75%
NTCT	C	1.75%
LMT	D	1.74%
HEI	B	1.74%
LHX	C	1.71%
ATEN	B	1.68%
RTX	C	1.67%
CYBR	B	1.67%
AVGO	D	1.66%
MIR	A	1.66%
COHR	B	1.64%
MRCY	B	1.61%
ZS	C	1.6%
CHKP	D	1.6%
OSPN	A	1.58%
OSIS	B	1.57%
RDWR	B	1.56%
DDOG	A	1.55%
RPD	C	1.55%
JNPR	F	1.54%
QLYS	C	1.54%
IRDM	D	1.51%
ERJ	B	1.49%
ZD	C	1.49%
AKAM	D	1.44%
AVAV	D	1.44%
TENB	C	1.44%
CACI	D	1.43%
HXL	D	1.36%
SANM	B	1.31%
CRWD	B	1.28%
OKTA	C	1.26%
DCO	C	1.22%
KBR	F	1.22%
BRKR	D	1.21%
GD	F	1.2%
APH	A	1.18%
TXT	D	1.14%
BA	F	1.1%
NABL	F	1.09%
VREX	C	1.01%
HII	D	0.94%
MVIS	F	0.84%
PL	A	0.83%
VSAT	F	0.8%
MASS	F	0.12%

FITE Underweight 58 Positions Relative to XHS

Symbol	Grade	Weight
HIMS	B	-2.63%
HQY	B	-2.56%
RDNT	B	-2.5%
MCK	B	-2.46%
GH	B	-2.36%
PINC	B	-2.35%
EHC	B	-2.27%
LH	C	-2.26%
CAH	B	-2.24%
SEM	B	-2.21%
DGX	A	-2.13%
RCM	F	-2.12%
COR	B	-2.12%
THC	D	-2.1%
PRVA	B	-2.1%
UNH	C	-2.09%
CHE	D	-2.05%
ENSG	D	-2.0%
CVS	D	-1.99%
DVA	B	-1.98%
HSIC	B	-1.98%
ADUS	D	-1.96%
AMED	F	-1.95%
PDCO	D	-1.87%
CI	F	-1.86%
HUM	C	-1.84%
HCA	F	-1.83%
UHS	D	-1.81%
MOH	F	-1.79%
USPH	B	-1.7%
SGRY	F	-1.67%
CRVL	A	-1.65%
CNC	D	-1.63%
ELV	F	-1.55%
BKD	D	-1.48%
OMI	F	-1.48%
NEO	C	-1.45%
OPCH	D	-1.45%
MD	B	-1.41%
AHCO	F	-1.25%
CLOV	D	-1.25%
CSTL	D	-1.24%
LFST	C	-1.24%
PGNY	F	-1.21%
ALHC	C	-1.14%
AMN	F	-1.06%
ACHC	F	-1.05%
NHC	C	-1.02%
ASTH	D	-1.01%
AGL	F	-1.01%
PNTG	D	-0.71%
ACCD	D	-0.64%
OPK	C	-0.64%
CYH	F	-0.63%
CCRN	F	-0.59%
MODV	C	-0.52%
FLGT	F	-0.42%
NRC	F	-0.31%