FITE vs. ECML ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE) to EA Series Trust Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML)
FITE

SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

FITE Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho Future Security Index. Under normal market conditions, the fund generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index is comprised of U.S.-listed equity securities (including depositary receipts) of companies domiciled across developed and emerging markets worldwide which are included in the Future Security sector as determined by a classification standard produced by the index provider. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$68.36

Average Daily Volume

4,275

Number of Holdings *

60

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
ECML

EA Series Trust Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF

ECML Description The fund is an actively managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF") that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing in U.S. equity securities that the sub-adviser believes are under-valued and under-appreciated by the market. The sub-adviser employs a quantitative and systematic approach to long-term investing. It is expected that the fund will generally hold 60 to 70 stocks that are selected from a universe that includes all publicly traded stocks listed on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") and the Nasdaq Market ("Nasdaq").

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$35.74

Average Daily Volume

1,188

Number of Holdings *

60

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period FITE ECML
30 Days 9.61% 7.29%
60 Days 12.06% 4.81%
90 Days 12.42% 5.05%
12 Months 36.77% 27.68%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in FITE Weight in ECML Overlap
SANM B 1.31% 1.65% 1.31%
FITE Overweight 59 Positions Relative to ECML
Symbol Grade Weight
RKLB B 5.8%
FTNT C 2.32%
S B 2.19%
FFIV B 2.1%
PSN D 2.08%
KTOS B 1.94%
LDOS C 1.92%
MOG.A B 1.88%
CSCO B 1.86%
PANW C 1.8%
OII B 1.8%
NET B 1.79%
VRNS D 1.79%
TDY B 1.76%
NOC D 1.75%
NTCT C 1.75%
LMT D 1.74%
HEI B 1.74%
LHX C 1.71%
ATEN B 1.68%
RTX C 1.67%
CYBR B 1.67%
AVGO D 1.66%
MIR A 1.66%
COHR B 1.64%
MRCY B 1.61%
ZS C 1.6%
CHKP D 1.6%
OSPN A 1.58%
OSIS B 1.57%
RDWR B 1.56%
DDOG A 1.55%
RPD C 1.55%
JNPR F 1.54%
QLYS C 1.54%
IRDM D 1.51%
ERJ B 1.49%
ZD C 1.49%
AKAM D 1.44%
AVAV D 1.44%
TENB C 1.44%
CACI D 1.43%
HXL D 1.36%
CRWD B 1.28%
OKTA C 1.26%
DCO C 1.22%
KBR F 1.22%
BRKR D 1.21%
GD F 1.2%
APH A 1.18%
TXT D 1.14%
BA F 1.1%
NABL F 1.09%
VREX C 1.01%
HII D 0.94%
MVIS F 0.84%
PL A 0.83%
VSAT F 0.8%
MASS F 0.12%
FITE Underweight 59 Positions Relative to ECML
Symbol Grade Weight
MLI C -2.27%
ALSN B -2.24%
CALM A -2.21%
HSII B -2.11%
TOL B -1.95%
GPI A -1.86%
PRDO B -1.84%
CEIX A -1.83%
PPC C -1.83%
FOXA B -1.82%
LNG B -1.81%
TMHC B -1.78%
OVV B -1.77%
INGR B -1.76%
SM B -1.75%
GRBK D -1.74%
MO A -1.72%
OSK B -1.7%
EOG A -1.69%
OC A -1.69%
STLD B -1.69%
PHM D -1.68%
DDS B -1.67%
KBH D -1.67%
GIII D -1.65%
ARCH B -1.65%
CMC B -1.64%
COP C -1.64%
SIRI C -1.62%
VLO C -1.6%
TPH D -1.6%
COKE C -1.6%
HCC B -1.58%
PCAR B -1.58%
MHO D -1.58%
ATKR C -1.55%
HESM B -1.54%
CF B -1.54%
AMR C -1.53%
TEX D -1.51%
LEN D -1.51%
BCC B -1.51%
DVN F -1.5%
AN C -1.48%
MPC D -1.48%
NUE C -1.48%
ANDE D -1.47%
PLAB C -1.46%
DINO D -1.45%
DHI D -1.43%
IMKTA C -1.43%
LBRT D -1.41%
BG F -1.41%
MTH D -1.4%
ARW D -1.29%
MOH F -1.29%
INSW F -1.22%
LPG F -1.17%
FOR F -1.16%
Compare ETFs