DBND vs. JMID ETF Comparison

Comparison of DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) to Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID)
DBND

DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF

DBND Description

Under normal circumstances, the Advisor intends to invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes, in fixed income instruments or other investments with economic characteristics similar to fixed income instruments. It may invest in fixed income instruments of any credit quality, including those that are at the time of investment unrated or rated BB+ or lower by S&P or Ba1 or lower by Moody?s or the equivalent by any other nationally recognized statistical rating organization. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$45.71

Average Daily Volume

49,311

Number of Holdings *

53

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
JMID

Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF

JMID Description JMID is designed to capitalize on mid-cap growth opportunities within the US market. The portfolio is constructed using a proprietary quantitative model that integrates fundamental research. Security selection focuses on identifying stocks expected to outperform, based on an analysis of various combinations and weightings. The objective is to generate alpha, or returns above the benchmark index, by analyzing key growth factors. Additionally, it employs portfolio optimization techniques to maintain alignment with the benchmark's risk profile. The fund may engage in active and frequent trading.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$29.47

Average Daily Volume

2,902

Number of Holdings *

78

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period DBND JMID
30 Days -0.43% 13.00%
60 Days -2.71% 15.60%
90 Days -1.64%
12 Months 6.86%
5 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in DBND Weight in JMID Overlap
CACC D 0.16% 0.48% 0.16%
EXPE B 0.3% 1.98% 0.3%
NRG B 0.17% 1.29% 0.17%
NTAP C 0.37% 2.08% 0.37%
SYY B 0.33% 0.76% 0.33%
DBND Overweight 48 Positions Relative to JMID
Symbol Grade Weight
UPST B 1.79%
COMM D 0.77%
BNS A 0.68%
GS A 0.66%
JPM A 0.62%
ABBV D 0.61%
DLTR F 0.59%
BAC A 0.56%
DFS B 0.49%
T A 0.48%
CVS D 0.42%
CCI D 0.38%
BMO A 0.38%
MAR B 0.38%
CMCSA B 0.38%
OC A 0.37%
SO D 0.36%
BA F 0.35%
KMI A 0.35%
ARCC A 0.35%
MO A 0.34%
DKS C 0.34%
GM B 0.34%
RPRX D 0.32%
ORCL B 0.3%
WTW B 0.29%
HCA F 0.29%
CCL B 0.26%
AAL B 0.19%
COTY F 0.19%
PENN C 0.19%
PFGC B 0.19%
POST C 0.18%
PK B 0.18%
GFF A 0.18%
MODV C 0.18%
SPH B 0.18%
UAL A 0.18%
PCG A 0.18%
VSCO B 0.17%
CHTR C 0.17%
UBER D 0.16%
BALY C 0.16%
SSP F 0.16%
OMI F 0.16%
OMF A 0.16%
GPOR B 0.16%
EXC C 0.09%
DBND Underweight 73 Positions Relative to JMID
Symbol Grade Weight
PLTR B -3.96%
APP B -3.36%
AMP A -3.08%
GWW B -2.97%
COR B -2.74%
IT C -2.72%
CPAY A -2.55%
ALL A -2.4%
EME C -2.37%
GDDY A -2.35%
NU C -2.16%
FAST B -2.15%
VRT B -2.12%
ARES A -2.06%
SPG B -1.86%
COIN C -1.84%
FIX A -1.81%
CLX B -1.73%
BR A -1.7%
MANH D -1.69%
POOL C -1.66%
CSL C -1.6%
VEEV C -1.59%
VRSK A -1.49%
LNG B -1.46%
DECK A -1.35%
EXP A -1.34%
TPL A -1.34%
DOCU A -1.26%
JBL B -1.2%
LAMR D -1.2%
DVA B -1.17%
LPX B -1.03%
ALNY D -1.02%
DXCM D -1.01%
WAT B -1.01%
BLDR D -1.01%
ZBRA B -0.99%
DT C -0.98%
UI A -0.95%
TPX B -0.91%
PODD C -0.89%
RBLX C -0.89%
PEGA A -0.88%
EXEL B -0.87%
VLTO D -0.87%
WSM B -0.81%
PCTY B -0.78%
RMD C -0.75%
TDC D -0.74%
HRB D -0.74%
NTNX A -0.73%
MDB C -0.71%
BSY D -0.66%
GNRC B -0.63%
KNSL B -0.54%
NXST C -0.52%
HWM A -0.52%
MEDP D -0.52%
PAYC B -0.48%
PPC C -0.48%
XP F -0.47%
DOCS C -0.44%
APPF B -0.43%
LOPE B -0.41%
TTEK F -0.4%
CVNA B -0.38%
RNG B -0.38%
CROX D -0.37%
ENPH F -0.32%
CELH F -0.28%
FTRE D -0.24%
TKO B -0.18%
Compare ETFs