CGRO vs. ULTY ETF Comparison

Comparison of CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) to YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY)

CGRO

CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF

CGRO Description

CGRO aims to benefit from high-growth sectors in Greater China without compromising American values and interests. The fund includes companies of all sizes located or primarily traded in mainland China, Taiwan, and Chinas special administrative regions, such as Hong Kong. The portfolio construction starts with top-down macro research, which utilizes publicly available data to identify sectors with the highest growth potential. The fund also conducts on-the-ground due diligence wherein it gains insights from 15 investment professionals located in China. Lastly, a fundamental bottom-up approach is used to analyze company-specific data such as financial reports and management expertise. The weight of each sector and company is determined by the sub-advisers assessment of its growth potential, which may change over time. The fund may invest in China A-shares, depositary receipts, and issuers listed on exchanges outside China.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$22.44

Average Daily Volume

747

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

ULTY

YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF

ULTY Description

The fund is an actively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks current income while providing direct and/or indirect exposure to the share price of select U.S. listed securities, subject to a limit on potential investment gains. It uses both traditional and synthetic covered call strategies that are designed to produce higher income levels when the underlying securities experience more volatility. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$10.01

Average Daily Volume

1,162,612

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	CGRO	ULTY
30 Days	-6.43%	11.33%
60 Days	11.80%	13.07%
90 Days	14.69%	12.01%
12 Months	10.13%

2 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in CGRO	Weight in ULTY	Overlap
	BABA	D	3.58%	3.48%	3.48%
	BILI	D	0.91%	2.34%	0.91%

CGRO Overweight 8 Positions Relative to ULTY

Symbol	Grade	Weight
PDD	F	9.47%
TCOM	B	7.4%
BEKE	D	4.55%
YMM	C	2.97%
TME	D	2.54%
BIDU	F	2.08%
LI	F	1.17%
NTES	D	0.35%

CGRO Underweight 20 Positions Relative to ULTY

Symbol	Grade	Weight
TQQQ	C	-6.89%
TNA	B	-5.84%
TSLA	B	-4.96%
PLTR	B	-4.65%
VST	B	-4.28%
NVDA	C	-4.27%
COIN	C	-4.09%
MSTR	C	-3.81%
SMR	B	-3.78%
ZIM	C	-3.76%
SNOW	C	-3.49%
DELL	C	-3.45%
UPST	B	-3.3%
SOXL	F	-3.01%
ANF	C	-2.96%
MDB	C	-2.46%
HIMS	B	-2.08%
CRWD	B	-1.95%
DJT	C	-1.23%
MARA	C	-1.07%